翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Photo Finish Records
・ Photo fraud
・ Photo Hunt
・ Photo identification
・ Photo instrumentation
・ Photo Kano
・ Photo League
・ Photo manipulation
・ Photo Marketing Association
・ Photo Mechanic
・ Photo Mill
・ Photo Ninja
・ Photo op
・ Photo paper
・ Photo print sizes
Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd
・ Photo psychology
・ Photo Raster
・ Photo recovery
・ Photo Researchers
・ Photo sculpture
・ Photo sharing
・ Photo shoot
・ Photo slideshow software
・ Photo Spot
・ Photo Story
・ Photo with Blue Sky, White Cloud, Wires, Windows and a Red Roof
・ Photo-book
・ Photo-Carnot engine
・ Photo-consistency


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd : ウィキペディア英語版
Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd

''Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd'' () (UKHL 2 ) is an English contract law case decided by the House of Lords on construction of a contract and the doctrine of fundamental breach.
==Facts==
Photo Productions Ltd sued Securicor Transport Ltd after Securicor's employee, Mr Musgrove, started a fire at Photo Production's factory to warm himself while at work and accidentally burnt it down, costing £615,000. Securicor argued that an exclusion clause in its contract meant they were not liable, as it said "under no circumstances be responsible for any injurious act or default by any employee… unless such act or default could have been foreseen and avoided by the exercise of due diligence on the part of ()." Photo Productions argued that the clause could not apply under the doctrine of fundamental breach, that the breach of the contract went to the root of the contract and invalidated the whole agreement, and extinguished the exclusion clause.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.